You say “potato,” I say “focus group”

There’s one phenomenon you really should be prepared for when you introduce the idea of usability tests in your organization:

People will think you mean you’re going to be doing focus groups.

Seriously. This really happens. All the time.

The problem is that a lot more people are familiar with focus groups than with usability tests. So sometimes no matter how often you correct them (politely and patiently, of course), they’ll still refer to your upcoming usability tests as…focus groups.

The good news is that as soon as you get them to actually come and observe a test, the difference becomes clear and the problem goes away. But until then, it can be disconcerting. And sometimes amusing.

Make sure you have your 45-second elevator pitch explanation of the difference down pat, something like:

“Usability tests are about watching people actually try to use what we’re building, so we can detect and fix the parts that confuse or frustrate them.

Focus groups are about having people talk about things, like their opinions about our products, their past experiences with them, or their reactions to new ideas that we show them.

So the main difference is that in usability tests, you watch people actually use things, instead of just talk about them.”

Are you running a book group?

Recently I’ve begin hearing from people who run book groups at work, telling me that the group had chosen Don’t Make Me Think (and in a few cases, Rocket Surgery Made Easy) as one of the books to read.

If you run a group that’s going to read either one of my books, I’d be happy to try to drop in online at the end of your discussion for some live Q&A.

All you have to do is ask me (at skrug@sensible.com.)

The book about writing

I’ve been working on a new book for five years now.

And it’s not about usability or UX.

It’s about writing.

I’ve never made any secret about the fact that I find writing to be ridiculously hard work, and for me, a source of, well…agony is probably the best word. And I’ve been doing it for forty years.

And not being a big fan of agony, over the years I’ve slowly found some things that make writing easier (no, not alcohol), and produce better results—things I wish someone had told me back when I started out. And for five years now I’ve been trying to shape them into a book.

Of course, the problem is this is writing.

I don’t have a due date. When people ask, I just say I’m hoping to get it done while I still have enough brain cells left to do it.

My new web site

It’s been 10 years since I last redesigned my site.

There, I said it. That feels better.

Tweet asking how Steve Krug can have such an awful web siteEvery so often, one of my readers will suggest, ever so gently and kindly, that my site is…well…kind of…sort of…old looking. And about once a year, someone will suggest that it’s…awful.

And personally, I’ve never taken it personally.

For a long time, people said the same kind of thing about Jakob Nielsen’s site. In fact, at one point there were a lot of redesigned versions of his site floating around that people had done for free.

It’s not that I ever thought looks didn’t count. It was more a matter of two things:

  • It worked well enough. It did what I needed a site to do.
  • I didn’t look embarrassingly bad. (In fact, in a way I kind of liked the way it looked.)

But as usual, even if you’re successfully dragging your feet the world eventually intrudes. In this case, the awful third-party solution I’d been using for years to provide a mobile version finally went out of business, so I finally decided to bite the bullet and use a modern theme with responsive design–and better accessibility–built in.

It was a ton more work than I’d hoped, even with my son Harry working with me, which made it much more pleasant. But I’m glad that it’s done, and that I don’t have to think about it for another ten years. 🙂

Are you teaching a UX/usability course?

‘ One of the things that’s surprised me about Don’t Make Me Think is how often it’s being used in courses, ranging from high school to grad school.

It makes me glad that it’s a short book, given my many not-fond memories of slogging through big boring books in college.

I love teaching, but I’ve never had to plan anything longer than a workshop, and the thought of creating an entire course scares the heck out of me. So I’m glad my publisher finally convinced me to write an Instructor’s Guide for Don’t Make Me Think to make life a tiny bit easier for teachers.

It’s filled with discussion topics for use in class, homework assignments, group projects, and even quiz questions.

Sample of discussion questions from Instructor's Guide
Sample of assignments from Instructor's Guide
Sample of projects from Instructor's Guide

The Instructor’s Guide is free for teachers, and you can read the introduction here.

To download the entire Guide:

  1. Go to the publisher’s Educator Resources page.
  2. Scroll down to the Instructor Resources section and click the Download Instructor’s Manual link.
  3. Click Request Access to sign up as an educator.
  4. Accept the Terms of Use, then fill out the Educator Access form, which will ask you to identify your school. You’ll need an email address that indicates you’re affiliated with the school. (If for some reason you don’t have a school email address, send me email directly explaining your situation, and I’ll try to get you a copy.)
  5. When you’re done, you can download a PDF of the Guide.

If you have any feedback on the Instructor’s Guide, feel free to leave comments below.

P.S. Once you have an Educator Access, you can also use it to request a preview copy of the book.